THE LITTLE ICE AGE 1280-1850 A.D. – The Roman Warming, The Medieval Maximum, The Dark Ages, Viking settlement, Thorvald Asvaldsson of Jaederen, Eric Asvaldsson, Black sea freezing, Ian Plimer, Greenland Vikings, Iceland Vikings, The Little Ice Age, Ladune, Bardsson, Glaciation, Gunbiernershier, Newfoundland, Groves, Snefelsness in Iceland, lichen, sunspot cycle.

Let us examine what many authors have concluded about this interesting period. To begin with there is certainly no consensus over its beginning and end nor the extent of the various periods. However there seems some consensus that the Maunder minimum was the worst of the four proposed periods.

Initially, I will give a synopsis about what many authors have concluded about the dramatic weather changes of the last two thousand years and the fluctuating weather patterns that at some stages have bought human prosperity and at other times drought, reduction in population, race movements and not least, abandonment.

Firstly however let us look at a graph that a conglomeration of Ice core studies from Camp David, GISP and Antarctica tend to summarize over the last 100,000 years (see Plate 1: GISP 2 and Plate 2: SUMMIT).These are based on oxygen 18 studies (that theoretically show annual precipitation rates, ash fallout from Volcanoes and various other Isotopes that express cosmic ray activity (from the sun) and ion concentrations from other elements. My purpose in this is to show the incredibly fluctuating weather of this vast period.

Continue reading →

Rationalistic viewpoints of the IPCC, Ivar Giaever, Kiminori Itoh, Dr Arun D Ahluwalia, Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, Geoffrey G Duffy, Dr David Gee, Hajo Smit, James A Peden, Professor Delgado Domingos, Dr Takeda Kunihiko, Dr Eduardo Tonni, Professor Ian Plimer, USSenate Committee on climate change.

The skewed results of the IPCC

I have become aware, since starting this project, of factors mediating scientific rigor. This factor is the extremely polarized viewpoints on the so called ‘global warming’ debate. I suspect the vast majority of people are persuaded that global warming (if it indeed is still persisting and this is against the facts conclusion) is due to human causes (or at least partially so). This is due largely to the work of a body of scientists calling themselves paleo climatologists. They have become a very powerful director of governmental and public opinion.

It is important that as you read my submission you understand that a vast body of climatologists and other related scientists doubt not only their veracity but lately their integrity. To this end I will be attaching a note on the objection of 650 international scientists, of undoubted credibility, who object to what I would label global warming dogma.

I see these highly credible scientists as essential to combat the seemingly rationalistic viewpoints of the IPCC

Continue reading →